![]() (And even if you do go the full Adobe route, and hire in an Art Studio to do the work, you still won't succeed.) So unless you're using $800sworth of Adobe software in the manner I did to deal with the this-way-that-way shadows and skewed verticals and disproportionate image features arising from zoom length variations, then no, you ain't going to manufacture a 'perfect panorama' from a random collection of uni-locational pictures. because no software ever could.Īpart from anything else, you'd need to post-process the output to correct verticals as well as figure out how to resolve disproportionate representation of an image element due to the camera having originally zoomed out, or in. Because if they weren't, then this software won't deliver what is promised. And, despite the developer's blurb, were shot from the same perspective. Need to have been taken under the same lighting conditions and approximate time of day. Until it's appreciated, that those photographs need to have the same focal length. This, however, is promoted as software which "smoothly combines photos of different resolutions, shooting angles and even different perspectives into one perfect panorama." ![]() About the only thing I can think an image assembler might do is put together several images as a mosaic. ![]() My concerns remain: that the hype for PhotoStitcher 1.6 is more appropriate for an image assembler, as distinct from an image stitcher. This program was offered almost a year ago so I won't reprise the GOTD comment I made then.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |